Good intentions are not the same as results. We evaluate government and private programmes in education, livelihoods and skills, using surveys, interviews and methods such as randomised control trials, to find out what really changed. The evidence helps partners improve what they do, scale what works, and make the case to funders.
What partners get
Honest evidence
What worked, what didn't, and for whom.
A better next phase
Clear steps to improve and scale.
A case for funders
A report to share with donors and governments.
Latest projects
Resilient Lanka: a baseline for an island facing the tide
A baseline study of a 23-family island in Kochi's backwaters, so a community plan against tidal flooding can be designed with the people who live there and its results measured.
Evaluating TinkerHub's maker programmes
Impact evaluations for TinkerHub, Kerala's creator community for students, using control groups to see what its programmes change, including a 13-point jump in women's confidence with technology after TinkHerHack.
Impact evaluation of the S.L.A.T.E Kunnathunad education project
Evaluating an education programme that reached over 12,000 students in 21 government schools, to guide its second phase.
Impact evaluation of the S.L.A.T.E–Rotary programme at GRFTVHSS, Thevara
Evaluating five learning interventions for 150 students at a government fisheries school, using the OECD DAC criteria.